In recent years, there has been a growing trend in the United States of counties and cities constructing larger and more expansive jails. This phenomenon may seem puzzling to many, given the efforts and progress towards criminal justice reform and reducing incarceration rates. However, there is a little-known reason behind this trend – architecture firms.
Across the country, architecture firms have been making the case for bigger jails and then getting hired to design them. This may come as a surprise to many, but it is a reality that cannot be ignored. As the demand for larger jails increases, so does the business for these firms, creating a disturbing cycle that perpetuates the growth of the prison industrial complex.
The first question that comes to mind is, why are counties and cities opting for larger jails in the first place? The answer lies in a combination of factors, including overcrowding, outdated facilities, and the need for more modern and secure designs. But ultimately, it is the persuasive arguments and proposals put forth by architecture firms that sway decision-makers in favor of bigger jails.
These firms use various tactics to convince counties and cities that they need larger jails. One such tactic is highlighting the issue of overcrowding. Many jails in the US are operating at or above capacity, leading to unsafe and inhumane conditions for both inmates and staff. Architecture firms argue that building bigger jails will alleviate this problem, allowing for better living conditions and more efficient operations.
In addition to overcrowding, many jails are also in dire need of updates and renovations. Some facilities were built decades ago and are no longer equipped to handle the current needs of the criminal justice system. In these cases, architecture firms propose building entirely new, larger facilities rather than investing in costly renovations. This not only guarantees them a larger project but also allows them to showcase their design capabilities.
But perhaps the most convincing argument used by these firms is the need for more secure and modern jails. In recent years, there have been numerous high-profile cases of inmates escaping from jails, highlighting the importance of secure facilities. Architecture firms leverage these incidents to sell their designs, promising state-of-the-art security measures that will prevent future escapes. This argument often resonates with decision-makers who want to avoid any potential liability for jailbreaks.
So, it is understandable that counties and cities are convinced by these arguments and opt for bigger jails. However, what is concerning is the fact that these very same architecture firms are then hired to design these facilities. This creates a conflict of interest, as these firms stand to benefit financially from the construction of larger jails.
Moreover, the design of these jails often includes features that are not necessary but add to the overall cost of the project. These features, such as large administrative spaces and fancy architectural details, not only add to the financial burden but also make it difficult to repurpose the facility for other uses in the future.
It is crucial to acknowledge that architecture firms are not solely responsible for the growth of the prison industrial complex. Other factors, such as the war on drugs and the privatization of prisons, also play a significant role. However, it is essential to recognize the role that these firms play in perpetuating the cycle of mass incarceration.
As citizens, we must demand transparency and accountability from our local governments when it comes to the construction of new jails. We must question the need for larger facilities and the involvement of architecture firms in the decision-making process. It is time to break this cycle and focus on creating more effective and humane alternatives to incarceration.
In conclusion, the construction of bigger jails is not solely driven by the need for better and more secure facilities. The involvement of architecture firms in the decision-making process and their financial interests in these projects cannot be ignored. As a society, we must critically examine the reasons behind the expansion of the prison industrial complex and demand change. It is time to shift our focus from bigger jails to smarter solutions that prioritize rehabilitation and reduce recidivism. Only then can we truly progress towards a more just and equitable society.
Word count: 900
