• Privacy Policy
  • Copyright Notice
  • Contacts
Wednesday, February 18, 2026
  • News
  • World
  • Middle East
  • Top Stories
  • Agricultural industry
  • U.S.
No Result
View All Result
National Truth
  • News
  • World
  • Middle East
  • Top Stories
  • Agricultural industry
  • U.S.
No Result
View All Result
National Truth
No Result
View All Result
Home Top Stories

ICE Lawyers Are Hiding Their Names in Immigration Court

in Top Stories
0
ICE Lawyers Are Hiding Their Names in Immigration Court
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

In recent years, the immigration debate in the United States has become increasingly heated and polarizing. As the government continues to push for stricter immigration policies, the role of ICE attorneys in fighting to deport immigrants has come under scrutiny. However, what many people may not realize is that these attorneys are able to obscure their identities in immigration court, without even needing to wear masks. This alarming fact has been brought to light by a recent investigation by The Intercept.

The Intercept’s investigation revealed that ICE attorneys are able to hide their identities by using generic identification codes instead of their names in court documents. These codes are known as “A numbers” and are used to identify individuals in the immigration system. However, unlike other government agencies, these codes do not include the attorney’s name, making it difficult to identify who is representing the government in immigration cases.

This lack of transparency is concerning for several reasons. First and foremost, it goes against the principles of justice and fairness. In any legal proceeding, both parties have the right to know who they are facing in court. This allows for a fair and open trial, where both sides can present their arguments and evidence. By hiding their identities, ICE attorneys are essentially denying immigrants this basic right.

Furthermore, this lack of transparency makes it difficult for immigrants and their lawyers to hold ICE attorneys accountable for their actions. Without knowing who they are facing, it becomes challenging to track patterns of behavior or hold individuals responsible for any misconduct. This is especially concerning given the numerous reports of mistreatment and abuse of immigrants by ICE officials.

The Intercept’s investigation also revealed that this practice of using generic codes is not limited to immigration courts. It is also used in asylum cases, where the stakes are even higher. Asylum seekers are often fleeing violence and persecution in their home countries and are seeking protection in the United States. The fact that their cases are being handled by anonymous attorneys is deeply troubling and goes against the principles of due process.

This lack of transparency is not only harmful to immigrants and their rights, but it also undermines the credibility of the immigration system. The use of generic codes instead of names creates an atmosphere of secrecy and mistrust. It raises questions about the integrity of the system and whether it is truly serving the interests of justice.

In response to The Intercept’s investigation, ICE has defended its use of generic codes, stating that it is a common practice used to protect the privacy of its employees. However, this argument does not hold up when it comes to court proceedings. In other government agencies, employees are identified by both their names and identification codes, ensuring transparency and accountability. There is no reason why ICE attorneys should be an exception to this standard.

It is also worth noting that this practice of hiding identities is not limited to ICE attorneys. The Trump administration has also implemented a policy of removing the names of judges from immigration court decisions, making it difficult to track their rulings and hold them accountable. This further adds to the lack of transparency and undermines the credibility of the immigration system.

In conclusion, The Intercept’s investigation has shed light on a concerning practice within the immigration system. ICE attorneys are able to obscure their identities in court, denying immigrants their right to a fair and open trial. This lack of transparency not only goes against the principles of justice but also raises questions about the credibility of the immigration system. It is time for ICE to end this practice and ensure that all individuals, regardless of their role, are held accountable for their actions. As a nation, we must strive for a fair and just immigration system that upholds the values of transparency and accountability.

Tags: Prime Plus
Previous Post

Pilots dismiss human error as Air India crash probe ‘far from over’

Next Post

Four CUNY Professors Say They Were Fired for Supporting Palestine

Recent News

  • All
  • News
  • Middle East
  • Agricultural industry
  • U.S.
  • Top Stories
  • World
Monsanto, plaintiffs seek $7.25B settlement over Roundup cancer claims

Monsanto, plaintiffs seek $7.25B settlement over Roundup cancer claims

February 18, 2026
Hannah Polskin Shares Why Pink, Gwyneth Paltrow, and More Celebs Are Filling Their Homes With Her Livable Art

Hannah Polskin Shares Why Pink, Gwyneth Paltrow, and More Celebs Are Filling Their Homes With Her Livable Art

February 18, 2026
Five-year ban imposed on horse owner who left pony in ‘continuous suffering’

Five-year ban imposed on horse owner who left pony in ‘continuous suffering’

February 18, 2026
Can Trump’s Plan for Warehouse Immigrant Detention Camps Be Stopped?

Can Trump’s Plan for Warehouse Immigrant Detention Camps Be Stopped?

February 18, 2026
National Truth

Breaking news & today's latest headlines

Follow Us

  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright Notice
  • Contacts
Monsanto, plaintiffs seek $7.25B settlement over Roundup cancer claims
Agricultural industry

Monsanto, plaintiffs seek $7.25B settlement over Roundup cancer claims

February 18, 2026
No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • World
  • Middle East
  • Top Stories
  • Agricultural industry
  • U.S.